We were told in 2011 that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has proposed a recommendation of 0.7 milligrams of fluoride per liter of community drinking water which replaces the current recommended range of 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams. Those in control are reducing the recommended amount of fluoride in drinking water, as water is only one of several sources of fluoride. Other common sources include dental products such as toothpaste and mouth rinses, prescription fluoride supplements, and fluoride applied by dental professionals. HHS says that Americans have access to more sources of fluoride than they did when water fluoridation was first introduced in the United States in the 1940s.
Be that as it may, how does RBTI view fluoridation of drinking water? Absolutely unnecessary. Not only that, telling the public that “water fluoridation and fluoride toothpaste are largely responsible for the significant decline in tooth decay over the past several decades” continues to “dumb-down” the public from understanding the vital importance of the diet consisting of high quality nutrient dense food which prevents dental disease, and more than that, other degenerative disease.
From this author’s RBTI Perspective, as well as being trained as a dental surgeon, all the forms of supplemental fluoride are the farthest thing from ideal. In fact, if looked at from a electrochemical standpoint, supplemental forms of fluorides are fundamentally toxic to human and animal electrochemistry — which is not a new revelation.
From my RBTI Perspective, the absolute only source of a natural fluoride that should ever be recommended to anyone, no matter what their electrochemistry, is a natural one-of-a-kind mineral colloidal clay that Dr. Reams discovered in 1934 as being extremely beneficial to human health which he named “Min-Col.“ Min-Col stands for “mineral colloid.” Mineral colloid naturally occurs in the soft rock or colloidal clay part of hard rock phosphate deposits in many areas around the world. The “soft rock” or “colloidal clay” is unique, to what is known in the agricultural industry, as a soil amendment called “soft rock phosphate” or “colloidal phosphate.”I invite you to read more about it here. You can also find additional details in my textbook Biological Ionization as applied to Human Nutrition beginning on page 163.
From my experience Min-Col holds the real potential for reducing all sorts of bone and dental disease, while synthetic fluoride treatments and supplements will not.
Thanks for stopping by.
Health is defined as a “state of being bodily and mentally vigorous and free from disease, illness or injury.”
Fad, on the other hand, is defined as “an intense and widely shared enthusiasm for something, esp. one that is short-lived and without basis in the object’s quality.”
Thus, the term “health fad” can be defined as any practice that one enthusiastically employs, which one believes will improve and promote their health and longevity, without any individualized analysis to reasonably verify the purpose of use. In other words, health fads come into existence due to beliefs founded on a common approved virtue rather than truth.
Stop and think about it. Are there health practices you are carrying on and/or promoting based on the power of a group-approved virtue, when you actually in truth don’t have a clue as to its benefit to your health or longevity. If so, you can be wasting time, money and especially your health in the process. Everyone may need to be de-faded sometime. One way to start is to acquaint yourself with a reliable reference point. There is a reliable reference point found in Reams’ Biological Theory of Ionization (RBTI).
Yes, RBTI first exposes the unique biochemical individuality of anyone, and then reveals the specific changes and alterations in diet and lifestyle practices necessary to bring on real health, wellness and longevity.
Beginning back in the 1930s, Dr. Reams was led to discover that true health could be defined through a mathematical model that has come to be referred to as the RBTI “numbers.” This model resulted from a keen understanding of the way Einstein’s energy equation (E=mc2) revealed how biological life develops and functions on the same type of energy that brought us into the atomic age. Having stood the empirical testing of time, Reams’ model is a reference point for true “perfect health” — not just “normal” health. Through the vast amount of health and diet information that this math model is able to reveal, from simple tests performed on fresh samples of an individual’s urine and saliva — health fads, facts and truths are readily exposed, along with how to properly feed and care for the biochemical uniqueness of any person.
For example, RBTI demonstrates that humans do not live off the food they eat, rather they live off the energy from that food in the form of ionic mineral, heat and electricity that results from the food encountering the right electro-chemical pressure or resistance from proper digestive enzymes. RBTI mathematically defines “perfect health” as the optimum building and maintenance of mineral energy reserves throughout life (see RBTI “Numbers” above), while aging and disease are nothing more than a premature loss of mineral energy reserves as demonstrated via the RBTI analysis. One of the conclusions of RBTI’s mathematical energy model reveals that anything in the diet and lifestyle that does not add to an individual’s mineral energy reserves, based on the RBTI urine and saliva analysis, would be classed as a useless fad.
Dr. Reams always brought in the subject of fads when addressing new RBTI students by saying:
- “The Biological Theory of Ionization is not difficult, it’s just different. And the unlearning processes in this course are one of the things you’re going to find most difficult, especially to unload your fads. When you unload your fads, you’re going to feel awful light. You’re going to feel insecure. You’re going to feel like you’re lost for a while. Then you’ll have the meanings at your fingertips to know the truth through the numbers.”
Reams often used this story in speaking about fads:
- “A man came into my office and said, “Doctor, what do you think about anybody living on an all raw food diet?” I responded in a joking way by saying, “It’s good enough for an old goat.” He said, “I raise goats and I live on all raw foods.” When I tested him, he was as sick as any person I’ve seen. What I’m saying is, don’t get hooked on a fad, go by the numbers. If the body is too acid, make it a bit more alkaline. If it has too much salt, take the salt out of the diet and be sure to use distilled water. If too much sugar, drop the sugar down. If the body doesn’t have enough of something, try to get it into the body, and don’t forget the importance of potassium. If it has too much, try to reduce it.”
A classic fad example that Reams commonly used, was the old “vinegar and honey” cure, which he usually told like this.
- “If you have read the vinegar and honey cure book, you’d think that the only thing in the world you needed to be healthy and live to be 150 years old was to take vinegar and honey regularly. Suppose that you had a body that was extremely acid and you also were a diabetic, and into this acid high sugar system you put more acid and more sugar, that’s a perfect example of the foolishness of fads. So what we’re doing is taking the fads out by revealing the truth of diet and health in mathematical numbers and we’re going to go by the numbers to understand how to feed the body.”
A beginning key rule that one learns from RBTI is that what is food for one person may be poison to the next, because each person is biochemically unique. In order to properly feed and care for a person’s health, it is vital to understand the biochemical uniqueness determined through the no fad science of RBTI.
If you are interested in learning the science of RBTI it is now available to you in the new online video training through Advanced Ideals Institute. RBTI Level 1 video training is now live and ready for your registration and participation.
See you in class online.
Xerostomia is a medical term that refers to problem with “dry mouth” — lack adequate saliva. Though we don’t hear the word commonly used, researchers estimate that xerostomia has a prevalence of about 20% in the general population. They also point out that it appears to be increasing because people are living longer and suffering from more chronic illnesses, for which the treatments can cause xerostomia as an adverse side effect. Dry mouth can especially be an aggravating factor in dental disease.
Recently, I noticed that an ad has appeared promoting a substance formulated to counteract dry mouth. I have no idea how well it works. However, researchers, last year at the University of Manchester, United Kingdom, reviewed research literature to score randomized controlled trials of topical therapies for dry mouth. They found 36 studies of treatments such as lozenges, sprays, mouth rinses, gels, oils, chewing gum and toothpaste.
The treatments in the review broke down into 2 broad categories: saliva substitutes, in which some other substance is intended to perform the role of the patient’s own saliva, and saliva stimulants, which are intended to activate the patient’s own mechanism for producing saliva. Two of the trials compared saliva stimulants with placebos, 9 compared saliva substitutes with placebos, 5 compared saliva stimulants with saliva substitutes, 18 compared 2 or more saliva substitutes with each other, and 2 compared 2 or more saliva stimulants with each other.
The researchers found convincing evidence that 1 saliva substitute, oxygenated glycerol triester saliva spray, was statistically more effective than another, an electrolyte spray. This corresponded to an approximate mean difference of 2 points on a 10-point visual analog scale in which patients rate their mouth dryness. However, this evidence did not actually prove that either substitute was useful for treating dry mouth, the researchers admitted. On the other hand, dentists admit that there is no one-size-fits-all treatment for dry mouth. Rather they admit that finding a treatment or answer for dry mouth can only be done by trial and error methods.
I have drawn your attention to the above, to emphasize one glaring fact. In all the research done regarding dry mouth, no one has researched the part that diet can play in causing xerostomia. However, Dr. Carey Reams discovered one commonly used substance in the diet that can cause dry mouth. That substance is Sea Salt. Yet, sea salt continues to be ever more widely promoted and used in total ignorance of its detrimental effect upon the electrochemistry of the human body.
Take a look at the diagram to the right. It outlines why, from the RBTI Perspective, sea salt is considered a poison not a panacea. It contains seven basic groups of mineral salts: chloride group, sodium group, sulfate group, magnesium group, calcium group, potassium group, and then the minor group. Within the minor group are mineral salts of carbon, bromine, boron, strontium and fluorine to mention a few. Plain table salt, on the other hand, contains only two of the groups of minerals found in sea salt. This makes sea salt not only saltier but it also possesses a large number of different salts compared with the same amount of plain table salt
The electrochemistry of the human body is constantly working on removing leftover and waste salts that have accumulated, in the body’s fluids, due to the metabolic result of diet and lifestyle. When these salts become excessive in various intracellular and extracellular fluids, they can be not only very dehydrating, altering and upsetting to the distribution of body fluids, but electrically irritating as well as congestive. Putting sea salt into the fluid of the human body can be compared to putting 7+ times more salt in a recipe
Dr. Reams tells this story to illustrate why sea salt can be a major contributor to dry mouth. “”One day a lady came in to see me and said, “Doctor, I have not had any saliva in my mouth for 6 years.” I said, “Do you use sea salt?” “Why, yes,” she said. “When did you start,” I asked. “Six years ago,” she said. I said, “Quit using sea salt and the saliva will come back into your mouth.” Three days and it did.”” Dr Reams usually goes on to say after telling that story. “When everything fails to give you an angina heart attack, and you just have to have one, use sea salt. It will collect in the muscles and fat of your system — especially the muscles lining your arteries and veins. Salt causes irritation and weakening of the smooth muscle lining of your arteries and veins. This results in the loss of the ability of your blood vessels to expand and contract.” RBTI reveals that Sea Salt does not add any nutritional value to the human body, rather, it only complicates and contributes electrochemical stress to this environment as it is considered, by RBTI, to be 49 times more salty than regular table salt. If extra salt is needed in the diet, use only table salt, which is mined salt that contains only sodium chloride.
The RBTI program reveals all sorts of dietary and lifestyle fads that have no intrinsic value to human health whatsoever. Sea Salt use is one of those health fads that unfortunately continues to spread because of ignorance to the human dietary electrochemistry. Reams Biological Theory of Ionization holds the keys to change all of that for those wanting to learn the real answers not the fad answers.
Thanks for stopping by.